Grade a Full Class of Essays
in Under 10 Minutes
Upload your rubric once. Drop in 30 student PDFs. Get criterion-by-criterion written feedback for every student — no prompt engineering, no copy-pasting.
Free plan · No credit card required
Used by high school and college teachers · Works with your rubric · PDF, DOCX & Pages · Grades in ~30 seconds per essay
Median hours teachers spend each week just on grading. That's before lesson prep, parent emails, or anything else.
Of teachers work more than 40 hours a week. One in four of those hours is unpaid.
How much specific feedback moves the needle on student learning. Most teaching interventions score below 0.40. Feedback nearly doubles that.
Built for Teachers & Professors
Automated essay grading that is consistent, rubric-aligned, and fast
Your Rubric, Your Rules
Upload the assignment prompt as a PDF or DOCX. Every essay is reviewed against your exact criteria — not a generic rubric.
Batch Upload a Whole Class
Select 30 PDFs at once. Each essay is reviewed independently in parallel. The class summary table fills in as results arrive.
Auditable & Secure
Every review is logged. Injection patterns are detected and flagged. Student text never contaminates the rubric.
How It Works
Three steps from upload to feedback
Create an Assignment
Give it a name, upload your rubric, and choose whether to enable letter grading. This becomes the context the AI uses for every essay.
Upload Student Essays
Drop PDFs or DOCX files — one at a time or a whole class batch. Review starts immediately in the background.
Review the Results
Each essay gets detailed written feedback across six built-in dimensions — or your own custom ones — plus key actionable takeaways. Enable letter grading to also receive A-E scores and an overall percentage.
See a Real Review
This is the actual output. Unedited.
AP English Lit — Gatsby Symbolism · gatsby_essay_john_s.pdf · 612 words · Submitted Feb 15, 2026
Dimension Breakdown
Thesis: clear, arguable. Good. Connects green light to American Dream, self-defeating. Claim: dream can't survive reality. Specific, debatable. Essay argues pursuit is a kind of death. Strong interpretation.
Three direct quotes. MLA in-text citations. Good. Works Cited? Missing. Big MLA problem. Quotes are well-chosen, support your argument. Citations are formatted right, though.
Close reading: strong. Analysis of green: hope AND envy. Nice. Paradox of achievement diminishing the dream's power. Smart. Shift from individual to universal meaning: insightful. Language choices: color, distance, orgastic future. You really dig into how they make meaning.
Voice is formal, academic. Okay. But it lacks a personal perspective. Analysis is strong, yes, but it reads like standard lit analysis. No unique voice here. Conclusion is effective, but it plays it safe. No risks.
Well-organized. Clear intro. Body paragraphs build. Conclusion expands. Each paragraph has a clear topic sentence. Transitions are smooth. Structure really supports the argument.
No summary. Good. Focuses on analysis. Each quote gets interpretation, analysis of Fitzgerald's language. Explains how the symbol works, not just what it means. That's good.
Key Takeaways
-
Thesis lands. Claim: dream's incompleteness is structural. Specific, strong.
“the American Dream is structurally impossible — not because dreamers lack talent or drive, but because the dream depends on its own incompleteness.”
-
Para 2: analysis of green as hope and envy. Sharp.
“Fitzgerald uses color deliberately: green carries associations of hope and money and growth, but also of envy and poison.”
-
Shift to universal meaning in para 4. Works. Expands the argument, doesn't lose focus.
-
Works Cited. Missing. MLA needs it.
-
Voice is generic. No distinctive angle.
-
Para 3's claim: green means hope because you haven't gotten the thing yet. Underdeveloped.
“which is why the light is green because green means hope and hope means you haven't gotten the thing yet.”
This is a rough signal based on writing patterns, not a verdict. AI detection is unreliable — review manually before drawing conclusions.
Real output from our analyzer. Sample essay, feedback format identical to what teachers see.
Six Default Feedback Dimensions
Modeled on English essay assessment standards — and fully customizable per assignment
These six dimensions are the built-in defaults. Each assignment lets you add, remove, or rename dimensions to match your own rubric.
Every dimension gets written feedback. Enable letter grading on an assignment to also receive A-E scores A B C D E and an overall percentage per essay.
Ready to Reclaim Your Weekend?
Upload your assignment prompt once. Submit 30 essays. Get structured feedback for every student.
Free plan available · No credit card required
References
- EdWeek Research Center & Merrimack College. (2022). How Teachers Spend Their Time: A Breakdown. Education Week. edweek.org
- RAND Corporation. (2023). State of the American Teacher Survey (Research Report RRA1108-9). rand.org
- Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The Power of Feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112. eric.ed.gov